Cell phones don’t feel newfangled but in truth they are. With innovation comes swift change, sometimes so swift that it is difficult for forensic scientists to keep up. Criminals use cell phones in a variety of crimes and it is up to the forensic scientists to uncover their transgressions. But where do they start? What are some complications that scientists encounter?

   

1. Innovation - Change is the number one issue for forensic scientists to overcome. Even the cell phone manufactures don’t always know how to retrieve information stored in new phones, so how can scientists retrieve the information? Staying up-to-date on new cell phones is challenging but not impossible. As fast as they are created, criminals come up with ways to abuse them. Strangely enough, this can be beneficial for forensic scientists. Using online tips can allow scientists to simply access information that would otherwise remain unreachable.
2. Charge – Unlike computers, much of what is stored in a phones memory is reliant upon the battery. When the electricity goes, so does the information. Depending on what information you are looking for and how it is stored, battery or charger power is an essential thing to think about.
3. SIM cards and removable media - SIM cards are the soul of a cell phone. They carry vital user information. Likewise, removable media, such as SD cards, can have lots of stored data on them. It is important that forensic scientists have the appropriate equipment to read and evaluate the data.
4. Passwords – Password protection on cell phones is challenging to overcome, though not impossible. Depending on the model, passwords can be circumvented in several ways.
5. Internet connection – The smarter cell phones become, the harder they are to examine. Using an internet connection instead of SMS or voice makes a forensic scientist’s job much more difficult.
6. Quarantine – One thing that is often disregarded is the need to sequester the cell phone before analyzing it. New text messages can overwrite old material, and connections to the internet can invalidate old data. It is imperative to make sure the phone is isolated.
7. Security augmentations - Forensic scientists must be especially alert when dealing with cell phones that have been improved in some way. Some users have the capability of putting in dead man’s switches, effectually wiping the contents after an action or a period of time. Malware can also be downloaded onto the phone, placing the computer systems in danger.

There are many more problems for forensic scientists to watch out for, but these are the seven most common. Tracing cell phone data is a laborious task, but it can be done. All it takes is a little investigation, a few tools, and a lot of persistence.

This is a guest post by Coleen Torres, blogger at Phone Internet. She writes about saving money on home phone, digital TV and high-speed Internet by comparing prices from providers in your area for standalone service or phone TV Internet bundles.


Talkback and comments are most welcome

Related posts

When Will Your Mobile Phone get Hacked?
Is Geo Location Based DDoS Possible?
Is the Phone Working? - Alternative Telephony SLA  

Stop SOPA and PIPA: We openly declare our support for the efforts to prevent the ability for governments to police the Internet.

Kudos to Wikipedia


Talkback and comments are most welcome

Related posts

Privacy Ignorance - Was Eric Schmidt thinking?

Last weekend I got into a discussion with an insurance supervisor on the topics of risk assessment. He explained the process of work of actuaries in insurance, and that there are standardized tables of probabilities for an event to occur, like sickness and death, and how it is used to calculate insurance premiums.

After digesting the explanation, my reaction was that I found the holy grail of the Information Security Risk analysis: All it takes is for enough amount of incident event be collected into a statistical table, and all possible types of information security incidents will have a standardized table of frequency and impact - no more assessments over the entire organization!

And in such a great and utopian solution, at least a quarter of the time the information security personnel will fell like they are doing actuarial jobs.

But I was quickly brought back to reality by the expert in insurance, with a good question: Actuarial tables are compiled based on information that is mandatory to be published - illness, fires, theft, even death. How will you collect accurate information from information security, when it's not mandatory to publish them?

And he was perfectly correct: Collecting information to compile an actuarial table for information security will be impossible. There are very few companies in the world that will release any information that there was an information security incident if it hasn't impacted the public in a very obvious way. Also, the value of the impact is calculated in any number of methods, and different items are included in the value, making the valuation of the incident an incomparable attribute from one incident to another.

Having a standardized method for risk assessment in information security based on hard numbers would be great. But since the factors included in any incident are very complex and varying, and also consistent incident reporting is nearly impossible, we will be sticking to the current qualitative methods.


Talkback and comments are most welocme

Related posts

Example Risk Assessment of Exchange 2007 with MS TAM
Risk Assessment with Microsoft Threat Assessment & Modeling